Luxury tax: only Chile-United States The free trade agreement includes a provision on this subject (Art. 3.14) that eliminates the luxury tax in Chile in 4 years according to an exit mechanism provided for in Annex 3.14. U.S. Department of Commerce. EC internal market, free movement of goods, free movement of goods, free movement of persons “New updates of 2005 data.” Available from www.census.gov/foreign-trade/statistics/. Retrieved 17 April 2006. The FTA has twenty-four articles. DR-CAFTA has thirty-one. Despite significant differences in the content of many articles, both texts contain comprehensive articles on issues related to scope and scope, domestic treatment, exemption from customs duties, temporary importation of goods, goods re-imported after repair or modification, duty-free importation of business models of negligible value and printed promotional material, import and export restrictions, administrative fees and formalities, export taxes, specific products, export subsidies on agricultural products, safeguard measures for agricultural products, textile guarantees, rules of origin and related matters (for textiles and clothing), customs cooperation (on textiles and clothing), Committee on Trade in Goods and definitions. Despite the similarities in the names and often also in the substance of these joint articles, there are also many significant differences in their content, as described below.
Here is a list of free trade agreements in which the United States is involved. The parentheses indicate the abbreviation, if any, the composition, unless previously specified, and the date of entry into force. With which countries does the United States have a free trade agreement? Tariff dismantling: The two agreements establish a transitional programme for the creation of a free trade area (Article 3.3). In both agreements, there are linguistic similarities in terms of the prohibition on increasing existing tariffs or adopting new tariffs. Both agreements make the abolition of customs duties subject to the list of customs obligations in Annex 3.3 to each agreement. Both agreements provide for the acceleration of tariff elimination, the only difference being the plurilateral nature of the DR CAFTA: each DR-CAFTA Party is informed of the acceleration conditions agreed by the other DR-CAFTA Parties. The DR`s CCFTA also provides that any Central American Party may grant preferential tariff treatment to another Central American Party in accordance with the Central American integration instruments, provided that the matter complies with the rules of origin of those instruments. .